Course Content
Qualitative and quantitative characters (qualitative and quantitative characters in crops and their inheritance)
0/2
Biometrical techniques in plant breeding (assessment of variability, aids to selection, choice of parents, crossing techniques, genotype-by- environment interactions)
0/3
Selection in self-pollinated crops (progeny test, pureline theory, origin of variation, genetic advance, genetic gain)
0/5
Hybridization techniques and its consequences (objectives, types, program, procedures, consequences)
0/4
Genetic composition of cross-pollinated populations (Hardy-Weinberg law, equilibrium, mating systems)
0/4
Breeding methods in self-pollinated crops (Mass, Pure line, Pedigree, Bulk, Backcross, etc)
0/5
Learn Introductory Plant Breeding with Rahul
About Lesson

Introduction

Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) can play a critical role in protecting the genetic integrity of a variety and generating revenue to support continued breeding work.

 

While the private and public seed sector share the same goal of developing improved varieties, there are important differences that must be considered when developing appropriate IPR for cultivars developed in the public sector. Public breeding often focuses on crops with high social returns to investment but low private returns, such as small grains, perennials, cover and soil building crops, root and tuber crops, and tree crops. Public breeders often focus on long arc research, that is, research in which the payoff may require many years of work, often by many individuals. After development and proof of concept by the public sector, the new products are commercialized by the private sector with little return of funding to the public side. In many cases the public breeding sector collaborates with the private sector to commercialize public cultivars, and considerations must be made to facilitate this technology transfer.

 

Current germplasm exchange policies are inconsistent across public-sector institutions, and in many cases restrict plant breeders’ freedom to operate. Institutions have different royalty-sharing agreements that may or may not direct royalty money to the breeding program that generated it.These inconsistencies create confusion and inefficiencies for potential private sector partners wishing to commercialize public cultivars and for those paying royalties to support continued breeding efforts.

Scroll to Top